Supornick v. National Retailers Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Plaintiff sues as assignee of rights of insured under a Minnesota standard policy of fire insurance. There was a loss, the amount of which was determined by a board of appraisers appointed pursuant to the policy. 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 3512. As defense to action on the award, the insurer alleged attempted fraud by the insured after the fire, first in their statement of loss and damage, and second in the hearing before the appraisers.
It is enough of the facts to say that there is evidence from which the jury could reasonably have found, as they did, for defendant on that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Phenix Insurance v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
- Glidden Co. v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Hodge v. Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Hamberg v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Abraham v. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989