Legal Opinion

Supornick v. National Retailers Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1941No. 32,444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Plaintiff sues as assignee of rights of insured under a Minnesota standard policy of fire insurance. There was a loss, the amount of which was determined by a board of appraisers appointed pursuant to the policy. 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 3512. As defense to action on the award, the insurer alleged attempted fraud by the insured after the fire, first in their statement of loss and damage, and second in the hearing before the appraisers.

It is enough of the facts to say that there is evidence from which the jury could reasonably have found, as they did, for defendant on that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Phenix Insurance v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Glidden Co. v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Hodge v. Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Hamberg v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abraham v. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API