Legal Opinion

Jessen v. De Bernardo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 3, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKole, J.

Plaintiff instituted an action under N. J. S. A. 9:16-1 et seq., charging that defendant is the father of an illegitimate child born to her on October 30, 1956. It is conceded that the child was born in New York and that neither the plaintiff nor the child has a “legal settlement” as defined by N. J. S. A. 44:81-3 and 44:8A-13. However, at the time of the filing of the complaint both plaintiff and child, as well as defendant, were residents of Bergen County. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff does not have a legal settlement and therefore cannot…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kopak v. PolzerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Leonard v. WergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Hall v. CentolanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Fiorino v. FiorinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B. v. O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. F. v. M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. M. v. F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API