Legal Opinion

B. v. O.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

50 N.J. 93 (1967)

232 A.2d 401

B., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

O., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 8, 1967.

Decided July 25, 1967.

Mr. Foster M. Voorhees, III argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wicoff & Voorhees, attorneys).

Mr. John W. Devine argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Pellettieri & Rabstein, attorneys; Mr. John W. Devine, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

This case arises under N.J.S.A. 9:16-1 et seq. (Chapter 16) which provides for the support and education of children born out of wedlock. Plaintiff alleged that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Geo. M. Brewster & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Kopak v. PolzerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Loudon v. LoudonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. J. H. v. M. H.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  2. E.I.B. v. J.R.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Jh v. MhNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. Wright v. GannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. In re the Estate of CallowayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API