Legal Opinion

Hall v. Centolanza

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 30, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

28 N.J. Super. 391 (1953)

101 A.2d 44

GLORIA HALL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RALPH CENTOLANZA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 16, 1953.

Decided November 30, 1953.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. William Bruder argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Marcus I. Blum, of counsel; Mr. H. Harding Brown, on the brief).

No appearance for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

In a proceeding brought in the Middlesex County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, respondent claimed that appellant Centolanza…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borawick v. BarbaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Gaunt v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  3. Kaufman v. SmathersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Donnelly v. Passaic County Court of Quarter SessionsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  5. Gaunt v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Dorsey v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Leonard v. WergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Sarte v. PidotoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Glascock v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API