Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Sauk County District Attorney v. Gollmar
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1966PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The sole issue before this court is whether a defendant charged with a misdemeanor can *409secure a six-man jury trial without the state acting through the district attorney consenting thereto. The controlling statute is sec. 957.01 (1), Stats., which provides :
“Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, criminal cases in courts of record shall be tried by a jury of 12, drawn as prescribed in ch. 270, unless the defendant waives a jury trial in writing or by statement in open court, entered in the minutes, with the approval of the court and the consent of the state. A defendant charged with a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Oborn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Bennett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- State v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Groppi v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. HansfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Court v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. LehmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.