Legal Opinion

B. L. Suhl v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1968No. 20672_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

B. L. Suhl and Margaret Wierman were each convicted on all counts of a six-count indictment and they appeal. We affirm.

Named as co-defendants were Ronald Vaughn and Richard Gibson. Counts one through four charge violations of 18 U. S.C. § 1341, mail fraud; count six charges a conspiracy to violate the same section; count five charges violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656, misapplication of bank funds. The first four counts all charge a “ ‘check kite’ scheme, whereby false credit would be obtained by exchange and passing of worthless checks between two banks.” Count one states…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Feldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. United States v. Louis A. Marchisio, John H. Seiter and W. Ward WhippleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence ShimelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Ziyad Abu Eain v. Peter Wilkes, United States Marshal for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. James Allen HiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API