Legal Opinion
United States v. Erminio Giustina and Irene O. Giustina, United States of America v. Anselmo Giustina and Josephine Giustina, United States of America v. Natale B. Giustina and Jacqueline Giustina, United States of America v. Ehrman v. Giustina and Marion Lee Giustina
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1963No. 17454-17457PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
313 F.2d 710
63-1 USTC P 9145
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Erminio GIUSTINA and Irene O. Giustina, Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Anselmo GIUSTINA and Josephine Giustina, Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Natale B. GIUSTINA and Jacqueline Giustina, Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Ehrman V. GIUSTINA and Marion Lee Giustina, Appellees.
Nos. 17454-17457.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 1962, Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1963.
Dougherty & Cairns, and William E. Dougherty, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Helvering v. Elbe Oil Land Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harold Barclay and Dorothy Barclay v. The United States. Philip Dahl and Dorothy Dahl v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. John F. Cawrse Lumber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1965
- Barclay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Giustina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967