Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Elbe Oil Land Development Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1938No. 446PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The question is whether certain payments received by respondent in the years 1928 and 1929 constituted “gross income from the property,” within the meaning of that phrase as used in relation to oil and gas wells in § 114 (b) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1928, so as to entitle respondent to the prescribed depletion allowance. The Cir cuit Court of Appeals, reversing the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (34 B. T. A. 333), sustained respondent’s claim. 91 F. (2d) 127. Certiorari was granted because of an asserted conflict with the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Murphy Oil Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Helvering v. Twin Bell Oil SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Kirby Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Parsons v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API