Eastern Public Service Corp. v. Funkhouser
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, C. J.
This is a voluminous record but the controlling facts are few. There are no novel questions of law involved, but there is much confusion because of the many details as to the transactions which are immaterial and do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
The outstanding facts are that the three appellant corporations were so closely allied as to be practically one; that the management and operation of all three was intrusted to one man, Homer P. Ford, who had a large financial interest in them; he controlled Ford and Ford Co., Incorporated, Ford and Ford controlled Eastern Public…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Winston v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Stanley v. Franco-American Ferment Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. LacklandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Williams v. DeanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Gross v. Citizens Mutual Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Chaney v. KiblerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938