Legal Opinion

National Carloading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 8, 1961No. C.D. 2294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LawkbNCe, Judge:

Plaintiff imported a device described in the record as a presetting machine, together with vacuum equipment and spare parts.

The collector of customs classified the merchandise as textile finishing machinery and imposed duty thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 372), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802.

Plaintiff claims that the importation should be classified as textile machinery for processing vegetable fibers prior to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. American Ecla Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  3. Mills v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaw Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API