Legal Opinion

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1955No. C. D. 1705PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

An importation of so-called pressing rollers for use in connection with drawing frames in the treatment of vegetable fibers prior to the conversion of the fibers into yarn by other machinery was classified by the collector of customs as parts of machines, not specially provided for, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 372), *203as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802).

Plaintiffs contend that said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitlock Cordage Co. v. Untied StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. American Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. American Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Columbian Rope Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Ittmann v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API