Legal Opinion
Guadagno v. E Trade Bank
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 29, 2008No. CV 08-03628 SJO (JCX)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket Nos. 18, 20]
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant E*Trade Bank’s (“E "Trade”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, both filed August 11, 2008. Plaintiff Maria Guadagno filed oppositions to both, to which E*Trade replied. The Court found these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the hearings set for January 12, 2009. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b). For the foregoing…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp. & Affinion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Zaltz v. JDATEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.