Legal Opinion
Consolidated International Automotive, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 14, 1992No. Court 91-09-00700PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter concerns plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees and other expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1988). 1 Plaintiff, Consolidated International Automotive, Inc., (“Consolidated”) charges that the position of defendant, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts from the People’s Republic of China, 56 Fed.Reg. 46,-153 (Dep’t Comm.1991) (final det.) (“Final Det.’’) was not “substantially justified” within the meaning of the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (1988). Consolidated claims that as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Sarah L. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- August Gava, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Inner Secrets/Secretly Yours, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Ferro Union, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Former Employees of Oxford Automotive U.A.W. Local 2088 v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.