Legal Opinion

Former Employees of Oxford Automotive U.A.W. Local 2088 v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 18, 2004No. Court 01-00453Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Restani, Chief Judge:

Before the court is plaintiffs’ application for fees and other expenses pursuant to USCIT R. 54.1 and the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2000). The application is made in connection with Former Employees of Oxford Auto. v. United States, No. 01-00453, Slip Op. 03-154 (Ct. Int’l Trade Nov. 25, 2003) (“Oxford IF), which sustained the United States Department of Labor’s certification of plaintiffs as eligible to apply for North American Free Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance (“NAFTA-TAA”). For the reasons set forth below, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. F.J. Vollmer Company, Inc. v. John W. Magaw, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API