People v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, Acting P. J.
Appellant contends that the trial court erroneously denied his Wheeler motion, 1 his conviction was not supported by substantial evidence, cumulative evidentiary errors and pervasive prosecutorial misconduct require reversal, and cross-examination was unduly restricted. We conclude that the trial court erred with regard to the Wheeler challenge but that none of appellant’s other arguments have merit. We therefore conditionally reverse the judgment and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings. Depending on the findings of the trial court, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HumphreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Dillard v. RoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- McElvain v. LewisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.