Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2004No. S113929PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

At defendant’s trial on charges relating to domestic violence, the prosecution offered testimony from an expert witness to explain that domestic violence1 victims often later deny or minimize the assailant’s conduct. Defendant objected. He contended such testimony did not fall within the scope of Evidence Code section 1107,2 which authorizes expert testimony on “battered women’s syndrome.” He argued the prosecution had failed to show that the victim here was a battered woman because it offered no proof that defendant had abused her on more than one occasion. The trial court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API