Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Jackson

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1989No. 88-SC-0751-MRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

This appeal is from the order of the Court of Appeals which denied appellant’s petition for writ of prohibition. This issue presented is whether, in view of the facts and circumstances surrounding the trial court’s order of mistrial, retrial is barred by the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Section 13 of the Constitution of Kentucky.

Prior to the commencement of trial, appellant moved for and was granted an order which required, inter alia, the Commonwealth to produce for his inspection all exculpatory evidence. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sanborn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Scott Lee Tinsley v. George Million, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Monsanto Co. v. ReedKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. DeloneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Estep v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Terry v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API