Legal Opinion
Hertzke v. Department of Retirement Systems
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 15, 2001No. 25167-1-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
The Department of Retirement Systems (DRS) appeals the superior court’s reversal of the DRS Presiding Officer’s decision holding that: (1) Eugene Hertzke had not retired effective September 1, 1993, because he had a prohibited written agreement to return to public service employment; and (2) his salary increase could not be included in his “earnable compensation” because it was given in lieu of life insurance payments and not in return for personal services. We reverse the superior court and affirm the Presiding Officer.
Hertzke established membership in the Teachers’ Retirement System Plan 1…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bullseye Distributing, L.L.C. v. Gambling CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Bullseye Distributing, LLC v. State, Gambling Com'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Peste v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Shelcon Construction Group, LLC v. HaymondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Peste v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.