Legal Opinion

Bullseye Distributing, L.L.C. v. Gambling Commission

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 26, 2005No. 31584-0-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Bullseye Distributing, L.L.C., sought a declaratory order that the slot-machine-like game in its sports card vending machine was a promotional contest of chance exempt from regulation by the State of Washington Gambling Commission. The Commission adopted an ad*234ministrative law judge’s determination that the game was a gambling device subject to regulation rather than a promotional contest. Bullseye appeals. Because the game meets at least one definition of “gambling device” under RCW 9.46.0241, we affirm.

Armstrong, J. —

*234FACTS

I. Procedural History

¶2 In February 2002, Bullseye Distributing,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Tenino Aerie No. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Wilson v. Playtika, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  4. State v. KozeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API