Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1984No. 81-2158PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Juarez Howard, Andre Howard and Michael Sommerville were charged by indictment with murder, armed robbery, burglary, armed violence, home invasion, and conspiracy. Andre Howard entered into a plea bargain with the State and Juarez Howard and Michael Sommerville were tried together. All charges except those for murder and armed robbery were dismissed at various stages of the proceedings.

The first two trials resulted in mistrials. Prior to the third trial, a ruling was made to sever the trials of Sommerville and Juarez Howard. Following a third jury trial, Juarez was found guilty of murder and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. WittedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. People v. NunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. DeMorrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WittenmyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. People v. DotsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. BlieyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API