Legal Opinion

People v. Brooks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 8, 1996No. 1-93-0216PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

A defendant in a criminal case has the fundamental right to present his defense to the trier of fact. In this case, the trial judge excluded the defendant’s alibi defense because of a minor infraction of the discovery rules. We find the sanction of exclusion was too harsh. For that reason we reverse the defendant’s murder and armed robbery convictions and remand the case for a new trial.

EVIDENCE AT TRIAL

The State presented 10 witnesses during its case in chief. This is a summary of their testimony.

On October 8, 1989, at about 7 p.m., Tracy Abrams, Lee Fredericks, Cherrelle Spencer, William…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. FoskeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. KiefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. RamseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. BaskingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. People v. HouserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Colbert v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API