Legal Opinion

Perma Stone Co. v. Teakell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1983No. 2550cvPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

This is an action sounding in negligence brought by appellee against appellants and others. In response to special issues, the jury found that various acts of appellee and appellants Perma Stone Company and T.G. Glispin (herein referred to collectively as “Perma Stone”), and appellant Victoria County Electric Cooperative Company (hereinafter “the Co-op”) constituted negligence and proximate causes of appellee’s injuries, and allocated fault as follows: Per-ma Stone 60%, the Co-op 30%, and appellee 10%. For the reason hereinafter stated, we reverse and remand.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Loyd Elec. Co., Inc. v. Millett, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  3. Teakell v. Perma Stone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Victoria County Electric Cooperative Co. v. National Steel Products Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  5. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API