Legal Opinion
United States v. Tranakos
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided October 9, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 1:88-cv-1437-MHSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1222ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on the Government’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendant Sarah B. Tranakos’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the Government’s motion and grant in part and deny in part defendant’s motion.
DISCUSSION
1. Summary Judgment Standard
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that summary judgment shall be rendered if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact ... and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” In ruling on a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Grady Allen BARNES, Billy Blount, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHWEST FOREST INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Interfinancial Midtown, Inc. v. Choate Constr. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Gordon, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of John B v. WebsterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021