Legal Opinion
Haro v. City of Solana Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 2011No. D057304PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
In April 2008, the City of Solana Beach (City) determined a mixed-use development proposal was inconsistent with certain local zoning *546and specific plan requirements, and directed the project’s proponents to redesign the project. About 16 months later, on September 2, 2009, plaintiffs Rosa Maria Haro and Carlos Ibarra filed a petition for writ of mandate and a complaint, alleging the City’s actions violated state laws pertaining to affordable housing and land use. The trial court sustained the City’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint without leave to amend,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Khodayari v. MashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Coalition for Adequate Review v. City/County of San Francisco CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Curiel-Aguirre v. County of Imperial CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Willis v. City of CarlsbadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020