Legal Opinion
Bermel v. Auge
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 1998No. C5-97-1833Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, * Judge.
Appellant Brian Auge challenges the district court’s jury instructions on right of way under Minn.Stat. § 169.20 (1996), arguing that the district court erred in deciding that the forfeiture provision of Minn.Stat. § 169.20, subd. 1 (1996) applies to the situation set forth in Minn.Stat. § 169.20, subd. 4 (1996). We affirm.
FACTS
On January 15, 1994, respondent Troy Bermel was pulling out of a driveway when a vehicle driven by appellant Brian Auge struck his vehicle. Auge’s vehicle had been proceeding on the public highway and approaching the intersection with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Norby v. KlukowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957