Legal Opinion

McColgan v. Bank of California Assn.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12087PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this case paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, of the judgment herein are hereby sustained, and para graphs 5 to 7 inclusive, thereof are hereby stricken out and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, neither party to recover costs. The effect of this holding is that under the contracts, the subject of this action, the right to terminate them exists, except that, as to advances made for the account of the owner and to him personally, there arose on the revocation of said agency an equitable lien in favor of respondent therefor, which, while not an estate in said property, is nevertheless a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Jones Trustee Etc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. United States v. Butterworth Judson Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. O'CONNELL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Grant v. De OtteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API