Legal Opinion

Miles v. Hoffman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1923No. 18215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is a malpractice case. The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial, and the plaintiff has appealed from that order.

In his memorandum opinion granting the motion for a new trial, the court said:

*654“For the purpose of disposing of this motion there are three phases which this case may be logically divided into, and they are,
“1st. The treatment awarded plaintiff by defendant when defendant was first called to take charge of the case.
“2nd. The care and treatment awarded plaintiff up until he was taken to the hospital.
“3rd. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swanson v. HoodWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Cranford v. O'SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sylvester v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Dahl v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dishman v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Crosby v. Grandview Nursing HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Peddicord v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API