Legal Opinion

State v. Kreder

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 28, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Harrison District Court. — Hon. Gr. W. Wakefield, Judge. The defendant was accused and found guilty of the crime of nuisance committed by keeping for sale, in a building he controlled, intoxicating liquors in violation of law. From a judgment requiring him to pay a fine of. four hundred dollars and costs he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

1. Criminal law: witnesses: notice by state. I. The only witnesses introduced by the state on the trial in the district court were six> none of whom had been examined before the grand jury. Section 4421 of the Code provides that the county attorney, in offering evidence to support the indictment, *26shall not be permitted to introduce any witness who was not examined before the grand jury, and the minutes of whose testimony were not taken by the clerk of the grand jury, and presented with the indictment to the court, “unless he shall have given to the defendant a notice in writing, stating the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RainsbargerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. YetzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. State v. HarlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. State v. DaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API