State v. Yetzer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cass District Court.- — Hon. Walter I. Smith, Judge. Indictment for fraudulent banking. Verdict of guilty, and judgment, from which the defendant appealed. —
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
1 -Haywood and Albert were jurors on the trial of the indictment. Mr. Albert, in answer to questions as to his qualifications to sit, said: “Have • seen Mr. Yetzer; know him; but have formed no opinionN about case. Could try it impartially without reference to anything I have heard about it.” On cross-examination he said: “I take the Atlantic Telegraph. Read it.” At this point counsel read to the jurors several articles published at Atlantic, where the Cass County Bank was located, with regard to which the fraudulent banking is charged. We copy two of the articles as fairly indicating the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MunchrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- State v. RainsbargerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- State v. WeemsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.