Legal Opinion

State v. Dale

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 4, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Butter District Court. — Hon. J. F. Clyde, Judge. The defendant was charged by the indictment with willfully and feloniously breaking and entering a building in which goods and merchandise were kept for use, sale, and deposit. On trial, he was acquitted and discharged. The state appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.

The county attorney, desiring to call one John Brannan as a witness, who had not been examined before the grand jury, and whose name was not indorsed upon the indictment, gave notice under section 5373 of the Code. On being called, Mr. Brannan was asked, “What is your present occupation ?” to which he answerd, “Soldier, at present; working for the government.” Defendant’s counsel objected to the witness testifying under this notice, for the reason that his occupation is not given in the notice as required by statute. Thereupon the state asked, “What was 1 your occupation before your…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. State v. RainsbargerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. State v. StanleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. State v. SchlagelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. State v. HarmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. State v. AltomariSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. State v. MathewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API