Legal Opinion

Cranston v. Gianassi

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1963No. Civ. No. 20752PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Martin Frederick Joseph Teddy died testate on August 13, 1960, naming the respondent, Ruth Anna Gianassi, as executrix and the residuary legatee of the bulk of his estate. On this appeal by the Controller of the State of California from an order of the probate court sustaining respondent’s objection to the report of the inheritance tax appraiser and fixing the tax, the only question presented is whether the respondent is entitled to be classified as a Class A transferee under section 13307, or as a Class D transferee under section 13310 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

The record reveals the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Niewiadomski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. Trudell v. LeatherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re the Appraisal of the Estate of BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Meisner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of TeddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API