Legal Opinion

State v. Lynn

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 25, 1922No. 10973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court-was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

This is an appeal by the State from an order of Hon. M. F. Ansel, County Judge of Greenville County, refusing to issue a writ of certiorari to H. S. Lofton, Magistrate, for the purpose of requiring him to certify to the County Court the record in the case of State v. Hugh Lynn et al.

The defendants were charged with disturbing religious worship and were tried and convicted in the Court of Magistrate Lofton. A motion by defendants for new trial was granted. No question is raised as to the jurisdiction or authority of the Magistrate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State v. BouknightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1819
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  5. State v. . SaverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DeschampsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. HollidaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. DanekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API