Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Sutliff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court of Seward county. Tried below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In October, 1882, the plaintiffs filed their petition in the district court of Seward county, against the defendant, praying for a writ of ad quod damnum. In November of that year an order was made in said court directing the sheriff to impanel a jury of inquest as provided in the mill-da'm act of 1873. The jury were impaneled and made their report in writing. At the May, 1883, term of the court the defendant filed objections to the writ, which were overruled, and he thereupon filed an answer denying the plaintiff’s right to the writ and claiming damages in the sum of $1,000 by reason of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gano v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API