Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Lloyd Design Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 25, 2001No. 00-2046PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ford Motor Co. (“Ford”), Jaguar Cars (“Jaguar”), and Aston Martin Lagonda (“Aston Martin”), appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for a preliminary injunction in this action against Defendant, Lloyd Design Corp. (“Lloyd”), alleging trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, trademark dilution under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), false designation of origin or sponsorship and false advertising under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and common law trademark infringement. We VACATE and REMAND.
*465BACKGROUND
Facts
Plaintiffs are automobile manufacturers. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Wynn Oil Company and Classic Car Wash, Inc. v. Michael F. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Wynn Oil Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Way Service Corporation, and Thomas A. Warmus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Tina Deal v. The Cincinnati Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Washington v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Lloyd Design Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. v. Toyota Materials Handling USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- General Motors Corp. v. Autovation Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Audi AG v. D'AMATODistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Ford Motor Co. v. Heritage Management Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.