Legal Opinion

Hearst Corp. v. Skeen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2005No. 04-0414PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

In this interlocutory appeal we consider whether it was error to deny the media defendants’ motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs’ libel claim. Because the plaintiffs, who were public figures, failed to raise a fact issue on actual malice, we conclude that the media defendants were entitled to summary judgment.

On June 11, 2000, The Hearst Corporation published “Justice Under Fire” in The Houston Chronicle. Written by Evan Moore, the article contained pointed criticisms of the Smith County criminal justice system and included three companion articles examining specific cases. With…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Huckabee v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. New Times, Inc. v. IsaacksTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Byron D. Neely, Individually, and Byron D. Neely, M.D., P.A. v. Nanci Wilson, CBS Stations Group of Texas, L.P., D/B/A Keye-Tv and Viacom, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. in Re Steven and Shyla Lipsky and Alisa Rich, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  3. Cruz v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2011
  5. Freedom Newspapers of Texas v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API