Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.
Before the court is the “Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)” (Dkt. 41). For the following reasons, the Defendants’ motion is denied in part and granted in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a dispute between a medical provider, Plaintiff Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. (Encompass), and Defendants Ingenix, Inc. (Ingenix), UnitedHealth Group, Inc., and United Healthcare Services, Inc.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Innova Hospital San Antonio, L.P. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Spear Marketing, Incorporated v. BancorpSouth BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Productive MD, LLC v. Aetna Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- In Re CYPRESS TEXAS LLOYDS, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.