Legal Opinion

People v. Whitfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to establish any impairment of his defense caused by the delay in *895prosecuting the case and thus has failed to establish the violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 444-445). We further conclude that the People were ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action, and thus defendant was not denied his statutory right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (1) (a). The delay attributable to the People’s difficulty in securing the presence of a confidential…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. FinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. People v. RosatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. BrandonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API