Legal Opinion

Widner v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for the price of telegraph poles furnished and not paid for. They were delivered under a written contract, and the court below held that Widner could not recover, because he had failed to join as co-plaintiffs certain persons who had signed the contract as his sureties.

The agreement purports to be between Widner as principal, and L. L. Culver and William Westover as sureties, of the first part, and defendant of the second part. The consideration is expressed to be “ the making of this contract with J. A. Widner, of the first part,” and one dollar to each of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Larkin v. ButterfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Commonwealth Thread Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. McGraw v. Township of LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. McKane v. GordonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API