Legal Opinion

McKane v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 13, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

General Assumpsit. Heard on the pleadings and report of a referee, and defendants’ several exceptions thereto, at the September Term, 1910, Washington County, Hall, J., presiding. Exceptions overruled, and judgment for plaintiff. All parties excepted. The opinion states the case. See 77 Yt. 7, and 79 Vt. 13.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The action is general assumpsit. Each defendant pleaded the general issue, and defendant Gordon also pleaded book-account in offset. The case was tried before one styled a referee and auditor, whose report was accepted and judgment rendered thereon for the plaintiff. The case was argued before us on a bill of exceptions in behalf of the plaintiff, and bills in behalf of each defendant.

It is stated in the plaintiff’s bill that no exceptions were taken in his behalf before the auditor, nor to the report. That none were filed in the court below, nor any claim made in respect thereto until the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. SearsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  2. Hard v. BurtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  3. Spaulding v. WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  4. Weight v. GeerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  5. Aseltine v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. E. Johnson & Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. F. S. Fuller & Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Owen's Estate v. PrichardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Daly v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API