Legal Opinion

People v. Tabb

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2009No. 213 SSM 47PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

During deliberations, the jury sent a note to the trial court that asked for direction on, or an explanation of, “the legal definition of self defense.” Nothing in the record indicates that the court informed defense counsel and the prosecutor about the contents of the note. In the absence of record proof that the trial court complied with its core responsibilities under CPL 310.30, a mode of proceedings error occurred requiring reversal (see e.g. People v Kisoon, 8 NY3d 129, 135…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. KisoonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. The People v.Kenneth NealonNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. The People v. Terrance L. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. WalstonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. The People v. Pamela Hanson, The People v. Julian SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API