Legal Opinion

Parks v. Griffith & Boyd Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Two appeals in one record from the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County, .to which the cause had been removed from Tal-bot County.

Read the full summary

Two appeals in one record from the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County, .to which the cause had been removed from Tal-bot County. (Adkins and Hopper, JJ.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court and in the report of a former appeal in 117 Md. 496-497. The following are the prayers offered in the case, and the action hy the -trial Court upon them: - Plaintiff’s First Prayer — The Court instructs the jury that if they find certain'fertilizer, three and one-half tons, or any part thereof, was delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants, under the contract offered in evidence, if the…

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

On May 25th, 1910, R. F. Parks & Son of Chestertown wrote a letter to Griffith & Boyd 'Company of Baltimore, as follows: “We are enclosing order for phosphate. Please

ship promptly. Must 'have fall prices at once. A party in our employ wants to start at once. Advise.” The receipt of the letter by the addressee was acknowledged, with the assurance that the order should have attention and then, “We note that you desire prices at once for the fall season, but owing to the unsettled condition of the chemical market we are not ■quite in a position to quote prices, but we will do our very best to do…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  2. Thomson v. GortnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. Hoffman v. MaffioliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. White Automobile Co. v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Thayer v. BurchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Debinski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. Blinder v. MonaghanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Foster-Porter Enterprises, Inc. v. De MareCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  4. El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Arkansas Valley Town & Land Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API