Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Gortner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 1891PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

In this record there are two appeals — one in an action of Irover for the value of two promissory notes, which the declaration alleges the defendants converted to their own use; and the other in an action of assumpsit for canned corn, bargained and sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. Both suits were between the same parties— G-ortner as plaintiff and E. B. Mallory & Co. defendants —and were both tried together, as against Thomson, one of the partners of that firm. The trials were had before the Court without the intervention of a jury. In such cases the finding of facts by the Court is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gelston v. SigmundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  2. Howard v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  3. Winner v. PennimanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  4. Myers v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  5. Delashmutt v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Strickler Engineering Corp. v. Seminar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Robinson v. GardinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Thompson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Foard v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API