Legal Opinion

Time Telegraph Co. v. Himmer

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 30, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The peculiar facts of this case authorize the granting of a preliminary injunction as to some of the defendants, although the complainant’s patent is of recent date, and has never been adjudicated. The defendant Himmer was the inventor and assignor to the complainant of the improvement in electric clocks, described and claimed in the letters patent of the complainant. While he was in the employ of the complainant as its superintendent he ordered certain clock mechanism to be made, which was identical in parts and arrangements with that now sought to be enjoined, respresenting it to be one of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mellor v. CarrollU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1905
  2. Siemens-Halske Electric Co. v. Duncan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  3. Woodward v. Boston Lasting Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
  4. Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Toledo Boiler Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Finley Rubber Tire Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API