Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1939No. 43413PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

The questions presented are (1) Whether the stock of the Underwood Company which plaintiff received in 1929 as a result of the transfer by the Neidich Company of New Jersey of its property and assets to the new Neidich Company of Delaware was stock of a corporation a party to a reorganization on which no gain or loss should be recognized under the provisions of section 112 of the Eevenue Act of 19281— that is, whether the Underwood Company was a party to a *589reorganization; and (2) If the Underwood Company was a party to a reorganization, whether, at the time of the reorganization, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Groman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Helvering v. BashfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. H.J. Heinz Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. United Light & Power Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Hedden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Neidich v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API