Legal Opinion

Hedden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 20, 1939No. 6971, 6973, 6974, 6972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

These are petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining a deficiency in the income tax for the year 1931 of the Hedden Iron Construction Company (hereinafter called Hedden), assessed against the petitioners as transferees of the assets of Hedden.

Bethlehem Steel Corporation (hereinafter called Bethlehem) was given an option to acquire the assets of Hedden. In accordance with a prearranged plan and at the direction of Bethlehem Hedden transferred all its New Jersey real estate to Union Iron Works Company (hereinafter called Union) and all its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Groman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Helvering v. BashfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. FreundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  5. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. United Light & Power Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Peoples Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1951
  4. Calcote v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
  5. Hedden v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API