Halliburton Co. v. Claypoole
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEWAN, District Judge (Retired).
The Halliburton Company appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict. It contends the district court erred in denying its post-trial motions and that, in essence, the judgment is not supported by sufficient evidence, particularly with regard to the jury’s finding that Halliburton defrauded Patti Claypoole. In her cross-appeal, Claypoole asserts the jury’s verdict was sound in all respects and that the district court erred in reducing the jury’s general damage award, as well as the punitive damage award.
We affirm in part, but reverse the district court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Goggins v. HarwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feltner v. Casey Family ProgramWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Pokorny v. SalasWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Thunder Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Little v. Kobos by and Through KobosWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Ravenswood Investment Co. v. Bishop Capital Corp.District Court, D. Wyoming · 2005