Legal Opinion

Little v. Kobos by and Through Kobos

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1994No. 93-125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant James R. Little, M.D., appeals from the district court’s order which found that his motion for a directed verdict should be denied and which granted a judgment on the jury verdict in favor of Appellee Michael Robert Kobos and from the trial court’s order which denied his motion for a new trial.

We affirm.

Dr. Little states the issues on appeal as follows:

I. Trial court should have granted Appellant’s motion for new trial on grounds that Appellee’s only expert witness on Appellant’s Lability committe[d] perjury on material matters.

II. The trial court erred as a matter of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. The Independent Oil and Chemical Workers of Quincy, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. L.U. Sheep Co. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Basolo v. BasoloWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kelvin Bourke v. Grey Wolf Drilling Company, LP, Now Known as Precision Drilling Company, LPWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Thunder Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State, Department of Family Services v. PAJWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sicor, Inc. v. SacksNevada Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API