Legal Opinion

State v. Crotsley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 1988No. CM 86-0273, CM 86-0293; CA A41802, A41803PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In these two cases, consolidated for appeal, defendant was convicted, after trial to the court, of six sexual offenses which were alleged in two indictments and which arose out of a single incident. He contends that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions, that three of the convictions should be merged into the other three, and that the court erred in imposing consecutive sentences. We affirm.

It is not necessary to detail the evidence. Essentially, it showed that defendant took the victim, a 14-year-old girl, to his apartment. He used a knife to force her to engage in two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. LinthwaiteOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. WiggetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API