Young v. Janas
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
This is the decision after final hearing in an action to determine the proper officers and directors of the defendant corporation. It seems almost incredible that one corporation should have so many election irregularities in such a short period of time. If the path of this opinion seems torturous, legally and otherwise, I believe the court is entitled to say that it is at least partly because of the way the corporate affairs were conducted.
The defendant Permachem Corporation (herein called the “Corporation”) has two classes of stock. The amended certificate of incorporation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drob v. National Memorial Park, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
- Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
- In Re Chelsea Exchange Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1940
- Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dillon v. BergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Levien v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
- Prickett v. American Steel and Pump CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
- Dillon v. Scotten, Dillon CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Young v. JanasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.