Legal Opinion

Young v. Janas

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 10, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 448PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

103 A.2d 299 (1954)

YOUNG et al.

v.

JANAS et al.

Civ. A. No. 448.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

March 10, 1954.

Richard F. Corroon (of Berl, Potter & Anderson), Wilmington, and John Lane (of Sullivan, Donovan, Heenehan & Hanrahan), New York City, for plaintiffs and intervening plaintiffs.

William Marvel (of Morford, Bennethum & Marvel), Wilmington, for defendants Permachem Corp. and Sigmund Janas.

Robert H. Wahl (of Rinard, Warburton, & Wahl) and William E. Taylor, Jr., Wilmington, for defendant T. Peter Ansberry.

SEITZ, Chancellor.

This is the decision after final hearing in an action to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drob v. National Memorial Park, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
  2. Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
  3. In Re Chelsea Exchange Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  4. Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1940
  5. Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dillon v. BergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  2. Insituform of North America, Inc. v. ChandlerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  3. Oberly v. Howard Hughes Medical InstituteCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1984
  4. Levien v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
  5. Prickett v. American Steel and Pump CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API